The decision
There is no universal best platform. Compare the same operating scenario across suppliers and distinguish demonstrated capability, contractual commitment and roadmap. An attractive feature matrix is not a substitute for an acceptance test.
What to check
- Use one brief: specify markets, brands, channels, payment models, current systems and expected workload. Give every supplier the same definitions and integration assumptions.
- Ask for a demonstration: follow one transaction and one restricted staff account across the workflow. Record what was actually shown, not just the name of a module.
- Normalize the proposal: compare platform GGR terms, setup, content, payment costs, support, app delivery, minimums and exit obligations. A planning calculator is not a binding price list.
- Score uncertainty: mark unsupported answers as unverified, not as unavailable. Give legal, security and operational requirements their own pass criteria before applying commercial weights.
A practical evaluation
Build five columns: requirement, evidence, contractual scope, owner and unresolved question. Shortlist suppliers that meet your non-negotiables; then compare total cost and implementation risk. nuke.ai's comparison pages are a starting point, not independent rankings.
Worked cost comparison in normalized units
Fictional planning example only: assume monthly GGR of 100 units, identical scope and a 12-month horizon. These are not supplier quotes or nuke.ai prices. Request written definitions, exclusions and terms for a real comparison.
- Offer A Fictional platform charge: 10% of GGR with a 12-unit monthly minimum; setup: 30 units spread over 12 months (2.5 per month); third-party services: 8 units per month. At 100 GGR units: 12 + 2.5 + 8 = 22.5 units/month.
- Offer B Fictional platform charge: 14% of GGR with no minimum; setup: 0; third-party services: 12 units per month. At 100 GGR units: 14 + 0 + 12 = 26 units/month.
- Sensitivity check At 50 GGR units with the same fictional terms, A remains 12 + 2.5 + 8 = 22.5, while B becomes 7 + 0 + 12 = 19. The lower-cost option changes with volume.
- Decision evidence Ask both suppliers to confirm the GGR definition, minimum, setup, game and payment fees, support, app scope, exit costs and taxes. Mark unknown terms as unverified; keep legal and security gates separate from price.
Use the calculation to expose assumptions, then test the same transaction and restricted-staff workflow with each supplier. Do not turn this illustrative result into a vendor ranking.
Explore the product
nuke.ai · Pricing · iGaming terms explained
Related platform capability: AI agents for iGaming operations.